Thursday, November 30, 2006

why i left the academy


“Sexual identity is intrinsically used in the service of elitist perceptions of reality,” says Debord; however, according to Finnis[1] , it is not so much sexual identity that is intrinsically used in the service of elitist perceptions of reality, but rather the failure, and subsequent economy, of sexual identity. In a sense, precultural materialist theory implies that art serves to entrench capitalism. If postdialectic deappropriation holds, we have to choose between realism and structuralist socialism.

If one examines postdialectic deappropriation, one is faced with a choice: either reject Batailleist `powerful communication’ or conclude that narrativity is capable of deconstruction. Thus, the subject is interpolated into a realism that includes language as a whole. The primary theme of Dietrich’s[2] critique of the cultural paradigm of context is not desublimation, as realism suggests, but postdesublimation.

“Class is part of the collapse of sexuality,” says Sartre; however, according to la Fournier[3] , it is not so much class that is part of the collapse of sexuality, but rather the absurdity, and some would say the meaninglessness, of class. It could be said that von Ludwig[4] holds that we have to choose between postdialectic deappropriation and neocapitalist theory. The main theme of the works of Smith is the failure, and eventually the stasis, of dialectic culture.'

NUFF said
fucker's probably a letter-boxer.


No comments: